<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pbcoreAssetType</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pbcore.org/v2/elements/pbcoredescriptiondocument/pbcoreassettype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pbcore.org</link>
	<description>Public Broadcasting Metadata Dictionary Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nino Gabrielli</title>
		<link>http://www.pbcore.org/v2/elements/pbcoredescriptiondocument/pbcoreassettype/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Nino Gabrielli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbcore.org/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>One thing which is not clear to me however is why &quot;Item&quot; is included in the PBCore vocabulary suggested for this element. (See: http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/page/1/vocabulary_id/137.html )

Isn&#039;t &quot;pbcoreAssetType&quot; supposed to describe the work and not its instanciation? What would be the use of the value &quot;item&quot; in that case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing which is not clear to me however is why &#8220;Item&#8221; is included in the PBCore vocabulary suggested for this element. (See: <a href="http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/page/1/vocabulary_id/137.html" rel="nofollow">http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/page/1/vocabulary_id/137.html</a> )</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;pbcoreAssetType&#8221; supposed to describe the work and not its instanciation? What would be the use of the value &#8220;item&#8221; in that case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nino Gabrielli</title>
		<link>http://www.pbcore.org/v2/elements/pbcoredescriptiondocument/pbcoreassettype/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Nino Gabrielli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbcore.org/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>@David Rice:

In my opinion, in an XML perspective, an attribute must describe the element to which it refers, not its value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Rice:</p>
<p>In my opinion, in an XML perspective, an attribute must describe the element to which it refers, not its value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.pbcore.org/v2/elements/pbcoredescriptiondocument/pbcoreassettype/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbcore.org/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t the &#039;source&#039; and &#039;ref&#039; attributes supposed to describe the content of the pbcoreAssetType (in this case &#039;Story&#039;)? In the example provided both the source and ref attributes refer back to the concept of the element name, &#039;pbcoreAssetType&#039;, and not the &#039;Story&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t the &#8216;source&#8217; and &#8216;ref&#8217; attributes supposed to describe the content of the pbcoreAssetType (in this case &#8216;Story&#8217;)? In the example provided both the source and ref attributes refer back to the concept of the element name, &#8216;pbcoreAssetType&#8217;, and not the &#8216;Story&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.pbcore.org @ 2013-05-18 12:33:04 -->